In recent weeks, President William Ruto has faced significant backlash over his administration’s plan to vaccinate all livestock in Kenya. The initiative, which is heavily funded by billionaire philanthropist Bill Gates, has sparked heated debates across the nation. Critics argue that the program is more about political preservation than genuine concern for the welfare of Kenyan farmers.
The vaccination program aims to immunize 21 million cattle and 50 million sheep and goats starting in January 2025. The government claims that this initiative will improve meat quality and reduce emissions, positioning Kenya as a leader in sustainable agriculture. However, many Kenyans, especially those in rural areas, are skeptical. They question the necessity and safety of the vaccines, fearing potential side effects and long-term impacts on their livestock.
Critics, including prominent figures like Reuben Kigame, have accused President Ruto of using the vaccination drive to curry favor with international donors and secure his political future. Kigame, a presidential hopeful, has been vocal about his opposition, labeling the initiative as a “business agenda” that undermines Kenya’s sovereignty. He argues that the collaboration with Bill Gates is more about financial gain than public health, citing Gates’s controversial history with vaccines and genetically modified organisms (GMOs).
The skepticism is not limited to political leaders. Many Kenyan farmers, particularly older generations who have relied on traditional farming methods, are resistant to the idea of mass vaccination. They see it as an unnecessary intervention driven by external interests rather than local needs. This sentiment is echoed by the Kenya Veterinary Association, which has called for a pause in the program to allow for adequate public sensitization.
In response to the criticism, President Ruto has defended the vaccination drive, emphasizing its benefits for the country’s agricultural sector. He argues that the vaccines are safe and locally made, aiming to reassure the public about their efficacy. However, his efforts to downplay the concerns have not been entirely successful. Many Kenyans remain unconvinced, viewing the initiative as another example of the government prioritizing international interests over local welfare.